Climate Denial Crock of the Week with Peter Sinclair.
In 2008-9, Coal was supposedly on the verge of a huge new buildout.
It all went belly up much faster than anyone imagined.
I had lunch with a major utility executive around that time, who was planning a big new coal plant near me.
I told him I saw no need to oppose it, mainly because they had missed their window of opportunity, and if they did build it, the market was going to leave it a stranded asset very soon.
A few months later they cancelled. They’re now committed to solar, wind and efficiency.
The former vice president’s efforts to walk a tightrope on gas reflect the fossil fuel’s precarious place in the economy. For now, it’s an essential part of American life. Biden has been careful not to make an enemy of the industry, especially in the key battleground state of Pennsylvania, home to the largest U.S. shale-gas field. His policies may even, in the short-term, support the gas market.
But in the long run, the fuel may prove economically and environmentally untenable within the power sector, a key market for producers. Biden’s climate plan would only accelerate that outcome, with massive investments in wind, solar and battery storage giving those energy sources a leg up. And his goal of a carbon-neutral grid would severely curb, if not destroy, gas’s share of the pie in favor of cheaper, cleaner renewables.
illegal gas flaring in the Permian Basin shows up with new FLIR technology
“Decarbonization isn’t a debate — it’s a fossil-fuel death sentence,” said Kevin Book, managing director of ClearView Energy Partners. “It means a resource is going off the grid. That is the inevitable implication.”
Gas, like coal a decade ago, is facing economic headwinds. While it’s still the nation’s dominant fuel source, it’s less competitive against renewables than it used to be. Solar and wind are now cheaper than gas-fired power in two-thirds of the world, according to a BloombergNEF report. In the U.S., solar and wind are already less expensive than even the most efficient type of new gas-fired turbine, Lazard Ltd. said Monday.
The right combination of federal policies could easily push gas out of the power mix by 2035 or earlier.
“This transition is going to happen more quickly than people thought, just as the coal transition has happened faster than people thought it would,” said John Coequyt, the climate policy director at the Sierra Club.
To be sure, gas may reap some benefits from a Biden presidency in the near-term. Though his proposal to limit drilling on federal lands could trim production, tighter supplies could lift prices, potentially making gas exports more profitable. Similarly, a thaw in U.S.-China relations could give exporters greater access to a major world market.
But higher prices would have the opposite effect in the power sector, where cost is key. Gas-fired electricity generation is already expected to fall 5.7% this winter compared to last year simply because gas prices are higher this season, according to Energy Information Administration projections. And that’s despite forecasts for a colder winter, which would increase electricity demand.
The economics put gas in a roughly similar position as coal in the years before President Barack Obama took office.
In coal’s case, Obama hastened its decline by imposing new environmental regulations that made coal plants more costly to operate – notably the 2012 Mercury and Air Toxics Standards that limited toxic emissions from plants, and the 2015 Clean Power Plan that curbed carbon emissions.
A Biden administration could take a similar tack, imposing new — and more stringent — limits on greenhouse gas emissions from power plants. He could also reinstate and possibly strengthen Obama-era rules curbing methane leaks from gas infrastructure, which were repealed by President Donald Trump. Both have the potential to drive up the cost of gas-fired electricity, without banning the fuel.
Most analysts agree that Biden wouldn’t explicitly go after the gas industry in the same way that Obama attacked the coal sector. Instead, Biden’s clean-energy policies would make it harder for gas to compete with wind, solar and other renewables.
“You might be able to adopt policies that at least give them a theoretical chance to survive, even if they’re going to make it much harder for them to survive,” said David Spence, a professor at the University of Texas School of Law.
5 Responses to “Gas Looking Like Coal, Just before the Crash”
- stuartbramhall Says:
October 19, 2020 at 2:49 pm 1 0 Rate ThisReblogged this on The Most Revolutionary Act and commented:
Gas, like coal a decade ago, is facing economic headwinds. While it’s still the nation’s dominant fuel source, it’s less competitive against renewables than it used to be. Solar and wind are now cheaper than gas-fired power in two-thirds of the world, according to a BloombergNEF report. Reply
- The post is over-simplified. Half the US fracking industry is now for fracked Oil (‘tight oil’), not gas, though a lot has gas as a by-product, which is often illegally flared off, especially in the huge new Permian Basin fields in Texas and New Mexico. see (here View)
- Stopping the oil industry will be an even more difficult proposal. Also much of the Permian gas is LPG, which can be easily liquefied and pumped through dozens of new pipelines leading to the Gulf Coast to fuel the gigantic new Plastics Industry now being built, (see here View) which, though hardly mentioned, may be the greatest US crime of the 2020s against the environment, and Climate Change.
New Gulf coast plastics industry aims to flood the world
- Raymond Horstman Says:
October 20, 2020 at 3:29 am 0 0 Rate ThisProgress is there. If you don’t want to do anything for the climate, do it for your wallet! Reply
- grindupbaker Says:
October 20, 2020 at 9:43 am 0 0 Rate ThisThe Capital Cost of energy generation can’t be measured in cost / MWh, it’s measured in cost / MW. The Capital Cost for energy storage is measured in cost / MWh. Reply
- mboli Says:
October 20, 2020 at 10:09 am 0 0 Rate ThisThe Lazard levelized cost of energy is measured in dollars per MWh of electricity produced. The report estimates the lifetime costs It estimates the lifetime electricity production in MWh. Costs include building and operating the generating station, including assumptions about financial costs and fuel and maintenance costs. A footnote for nuclear energy specifies that it doesn’t include decommissioning costs. From which we can assume that decommissioning costs are included for the other technologies. Here is the 2020 report. Which recently came out, which is why there have been a lot of articles on it. https://www.lazard.com/perspective/levelized-cost-of-energy-and-levelized-cost-of-storage-2020/ Reply
- mboli Says: